NEW YORK -- Its proponents, including Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger and the Dean of the School of International and Public Affairs, contended that having Iranian Dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speak on campus would be a big step in the direction of mutual understanding.
Instead, Bollinger and Columbia University stepped into a black hole of shame, from which there is no escape.
What has the passage of a year wrought?
Only a better understanding of just how misguided Bollinger, John H. Coatsworth (the SIPA Dean), Richard W. Bulliet (the professor who initiated the A-Jad invitation) and the entire Columbia University Board of Trustees were.
Columbia University was played to the max by Ahmadinejad, who basked in the credibility his appearance provided for his gay-bashing, women-stoning, anti-American, destroy-Israel agenda. Bollinger and Columbia University have been accessories to every action of A-Jad since September 24, 2007. And, Bollinger and Columbia University will go down in history as having been duped by one of the 21st Century's most evil leaders.
What else has time revealed about the 2007 A-Jad speech at Columbia? Like a politician who serves his or her entire career with distinction, and then is caught in a lurid scandal, Columbia’s biographers and obituary writers will forever associate the school with a man who openly calls for Holocaust II against the Jewish people and the State of Israel.
We strongly suspect that Columbia has paid a financial price, as well, for its embrace of A-Jad. We know alumni donors who’ve cut or eliminated their contributions to the school in the wake of the September 24th blasphemy. And really, there is no way to know which major domo donors who might have once considered a major gift to Columbia have reconsidered.
One year later A-Jad and his hate-filled regime are stronger and more menacing than ever. As for Bollinger, Coatsworth, Bulliet and the other vermin who disgraced themselves and their university, we see no signs that they’ve managed to redeem their tarnished reputations even an iota.
In Jewish tradition, one remembers those who have died each year on the anniversary of their deaths by saying a special Yizkor prayer and lighting a candle. This September 24th, many Columbia University alumni and friends of the school will be lighting a candle for Columbia University to commemorate the day its morality perished.
And so it begins.
Robert Kraft, who continued to funnel large financial contributions to Columbia University even after the University invited Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to disgrace its campus, has tasted the power of the ‘Curse of Ahmadinejad.’
Standby. Kraft is just the first of many Columbia University apologists who will find their once good fortunes bankrupted.
In what many believe is the greatest Super Bowl upset ever, the New York Giants emerged victorious, trumping the previously 18-0 New England Patriots in the final seconds of the game following a truly miraculous 83-yard, 12-play drive. During that drive, Giants quarterback Eli Manning was swarmed under by Patriots defenders, only to emerge from the scrum to throw a game-saving pass to David Tyree, who caught the ball on the tips of his fingers and steadied it with his head as he fell to the ground.
Somewhere in heaven, the spirits of Mordechai and Esther are smiling broadly.
Don’t believe this relates to the Ahmadinejad speech? Don’t believe that Robert Kraft is now cursed? Be patient. In the months and years to come, you will likewise see the dreams and careers of other Columbia University perpetrators – including Lee C. Bollinger, John H. Coatsworth and Richard W. Bulliet – slip through their hands like the Super Bowl XLII trophy that Robert Kraft had oh-so-close to his grasp.
You see, Columbia University committed a crime against decency when it invited Ahmadinejad to speak on campus last September 24th. A-Jad is an avowed anti-gay, anti-women, anti-American, anti-Semite who dreams of nuking Israel and then America off the face of the planet.
The Columbia University administration, led by the deeply, deeply misguided Bollinger, invited A-Jad to speak on campus in the name of academic freedom. Bad enough.
What is worse, however, is that the Board of Trustees of Columbia University, of which Kraft is a member emeritus and large donors such as Kraft, remained publicly silent. Deadly silent.
We will leave it to heavenly judges to decide whether the many good things that Kraft has done in his life are to be offset by his acquiescence in the matter of the genocidal A-Jad. But what is undeniable is this: Kraft is more likely to be remembered for this year’s utterly amazing Super Bowl loss than for his previous or future victories.
There once was a powerful and self-confident statesman in ancient Persia who – like Kraft – thought himself invincible. Haman’s plan was to murder all the Jews, just like Ahmadinejad’s current ambition. Both men failed to see that all their earthly powers didn’t amount to fingernail dirt on the cosmic plane.
Haman was hung on the very gallows he built for the Jews. Ahmadinejad, too, will fall to his own evil schemes. And as for Kraft, Bollinger, Coatsworth and Bulliet – not to mention the 22 members of the Columbia University Board of Trustees – well, we wouldn’t be betting on their winning any Super Bowls anytime soon.
<< MORE >>
On the eve of the SuperBowl, the owner of The New England Patriots has been named a recipient of the “Franklin Delano Roosevelt Acquiescence Award.”
Bnai Haman voted unanimously to confer the Roosevelt Acquiescence Award on Robert Kraft, owner and CEO of the New England Patriots since 1994. The group is actively engaged in reminding the world of the harm that follows from allowing those who preach hate and genocide – such as Iranian Dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – to use well respected democratic universities as a platform.
Bnai Haman noted that Kraft, an alumnus of Columbia University and a trustee emeritus, went ahead and announced a major donation to Columbia’s athletic program even after the infamous September 24, 2007 appearance at Columbia of Ahmadinejad.
“Like Franklin D. Roosevelt, who history has demonstrated could have saved many, many thousands of Jewish lives during the Holocaust but chose not to, Kraft could have been publicly outspoken against the Ahmadinejad speech – both before and after -- but remained silent,” Bnai Haman said in conferring the Roosevelt award on Kraft.
Bnai Haman acknowledged the many worthy causes – both Jewish and non-Jewish that Kraft and his family have funded over the years. “In our playbook, however, victory in one arena doesn’t mitigate a moral silence elsewhere,” Bnai Haman said.
Historian Lucy Dawidowicz has noted that while Hitler lost World War II, his “War Against the Jews” was actually successful, thanks in part, to Roosevelt’s acquiescence. Likewise, while the Patriots may be a success on the gridiron and Kraft may be feted for his many charitable contributions, Bnai Haman says Kraft had the power to publicly and effectively ostracize Columbia for its invitation to Ahmadinejad but failed to use it.
Meanwhile, not a soul in the Columbia University administration or on its Board of Trustees has come forward to say that perhaps, just perhaps, inviting Ahmadinejad to (dis)grace the University with his presence was an error. Should A-Jad succeed in killing off the "filthy" Jews and Israel, perhaps Columbia will invite him back to discuss his methods. We wouldn't be surprised.
“When we weighed all the evidence, and with the benefit of 20-20 hindsight, we realize that the troika of Bollinger, Coatsworth and Bulliet couldn’t have succeeded without the support of the Board of Trustees,” Bnai Haman said. “These 23 men and women must also be remembered for their role in the A-Jad speech,” the group said.
<< MORE >> ![]() |
| Goldman Sachs Web Page Featuring Esta E. Stecher |
|
| Cambell Soup Web Page Featuring Ellen Oran Kaden |